Under suspicion: a follow up commentary of crash diet crazes.
Thursday, July 5th, 2007A couple of days ago I posted about the Kimkins diet controversy that’s being chronicled on another blog. Now, to be fair, the articles found there is a small expose about ONE diet craze that’s out there. Given the publicity behind this diet however, it’s a great example of the many problems that ensue in a diet crazed world. When so many people are raising questions about the validity of not only the diet, but the “guru” behind this plan (including accusations by many on the use of stock or fake photos to promote), it becomes a meaningful story that needs to be told.
There are many many comments found on low carb forums splashed all over the net. One that struck a chord with me was this one:
“One good question folks brought up there is - where are the “maintainers” on this plan? Can you really do this long-term without the fat?
”
I’ve asked this question myself. And let me be honest, calling my food plan a “diet” leaves me with a very sour taste in my mouth. You see, I used to be a big (pun intended) supporter of the fat or size acceptance movement. I have met many friends who have tried then shunned many diets over the years because they became fed up with yo-yo weight gain. I’ve met people who lost 150 lbs only to gain it all back and pack on more weight than where they started.
The other thing that bugs me are story lines of people who lose weight FAST, and get pics of their new bodies splashed all over magazines. So I’m going to make a promise here and now. If I’m personally EVER splashed in a magazine spread, it’s going to be an article that promotes healthy weight loss AND maintaining that weight loss over a stretch of 10 years or more. So, see you in 10 years ok? LOL
What is the rush towards rapid weight loss without healthy eating habits? What’s with the rush of weight loss without promoting exercise? If any of us who are dedicated followers of a *proper* glycemic index diet, you know that within the books you’ve purchased, exercise is PROMOTED. Period. End of Story.
I’ve kick started my swimming regime this summer with some pretty aggressive weight loss goals. By aggressive, I’m going to say roughly 20 lbs per month. The reason is simple: I love swimming and exercising outdoors and summer is the best time for active weight loss. Given the fact that I lose about 2000 calories over a 90 minute swim (that is not an exaggeration), could I possibly maintain my energy levels during a swim like this if I was on a starvation diet like that of “kimkins” ? Could 600 calories containing very low carbs assist me during this exercise routine? I have my doubts.
The GI Diet, on the other hand is the type of diet that helps with energy levels and promotes a more balanced approach. I’ll even go as far as to say, someone on a *moderate* atkins diet plan will also benefit from the protein rich diet that doesn’t significantly reduce calories that will cause your body to go into starvation mode. Men’s Health and other magz promoting weight loss by exercise continue to by my personal inspiration on balanced dieting with exercise training.
On final note: I’m a simple blogger with a simple message. At 475 lbs, I started my path back to healthier living by finally starting to listen to the advice of doctors, all of whom did not suggest a very low calorie diet. Only one, who just met me at 360 lbs, presented the idea of gastric bypass or atkins as options. When I told her I lost 125-130 lbs on exercising and use of the GI diet, her only comment was: carry on then. What more could she say? I’ve maintained this weight loss without yo-yoing for over 3 year now.
From where I sit, that’s exactly what I’m going to continue to do.




Self Portrait Sunday


